An international Delphi consensus for surgical quality assessment of lymphadenectomy and anastomosis in minimally invasive total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive total gastrectomy (MITG) is a mainstay for curative treatment of patients with gastric cancer. To define and standardize optimal surgical techniques and further improve clinical outcomes through the enhanced MITG surgical quality, there must be consensus on the key technical steps of lymphadenectomy and anastomosis creation, which is currently lacking. This study aimed to determine an expert consensus from an international panel regarding the technical aspects of the performance of MITG for oncological indications using the Delphi method. METHODS: A 100-point scoping survey was created based on the deconstruction of MITG into its key technical steps through local and international expert opinion and literature evidence. An international expert panel comprising upper gastrointestinal and general surgeons participated in multiple rounds of a Delphi consensus. The panelists voted on the issues concerning importance, difficulty, or agreement using an online questionnaire. A priori consensus standard was set at > 80% for agreement to a statement. Internal consistency and reliability were evaluated using Cronbach's α. RESULTS: Thirty expert upper gastrointestinal and general surgeons participated in three online Delphi rounds, generating a final consensus of 41 statements regarding MITG for gastric cancer. The consensus was gained from 22, 12, and 7 questions from Delphi rounds 1, 2, and 3, which were rephrased into the 41 statetments respectively. For lymphadenectomy and aspects of anastomosis creation, Cronbach's α for round 1 was 0.896 and 0.886, and for round 2 was 0.848 and 0.779, regarding difficulty or importance. CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi consensus defined 41 steps as crucial for performing a high-quality MITG for oncological indications based on the standards of an international panel. The results of this consensus provide a platform for creating and validating surgical quality assessment tools designed to improve clinical outcomes and standardize surgical quality in MITG.

Anti-reflux surgery vs. bariatric surgery as anti-GERD and hiatal hernia treatment in obese patient. New surgical proposals.

The persistence of obesity favors the failure of the Fundoplication (FP) in the treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux (GER). However, the weight loss obtained with the performance of a Gastric Bypass (GBP) allows a good resolution of symptoms, without increasing the incidence of postoperative complications. All of this leads us to consider that while FP is the indication in patients with BMI < 30, in those patients with BMI > 35, GBP appears to be the procedure of choice. But there is still no position in the case of patients with a BMI between 30 and 35, although we must take into account that an increase in GER recurrence has been described after FP in patients with a BMI > 30. Although Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) is one of the most frequently used bariatric procedures in recent years, its association with a high rate of postoperative GER has led several authors to propose its performance associated with an anti-reflux procedure in patients with GER symptoms. Likewise, if the existence of an Hiatal Hernia is verified, it must be treated by hiatoplasty, both during the performance of a GBP and a SG. This simultaneous treatment is not associated with an increase in complications.

Obesity Surgery Improves Hypogonadism and Sexual Function in Men without Effects in Sperm Quality.

(1) Background: Obesity is associated with hypogonadism, sexual dysfunction, and impaired fertility in men. However, its effects on semen parameters or sexual function remain debatable. (2) Methods: This paper involves a longitudinal study in men submitted for obesity surgery at a university tertiary hospital. Patients were studied at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months after obesity surgery. At each visit, anthropometry measures were collected and hormonal and semen parameters were studied. Sexual function was evaluated with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). (3) Results: A total of 12 patients were included. The average body mass index of patients decreased from 42.37 ± 4.44 to 29.6 ± 3.77 kg/m2 at 18 months after surgery (p < 0.05). Hormonal parameters improved after obesity surgery. The proportion of sperm cells with normal morphology tended to decrease from baseline and became most significant at 18 months (5.83 ± 4.50 vs. 2.82 ± 2.08). No significant changes were found in the remaining semen parameters. Erectile function improved significantly at six months after surgery. (4) Conclusions: The authors believe that, in general, the effects of obesity surgery on fertility may be limited or even deleterious (at least in the short and midterm follow-up).

Is Sleeve Gastrectomy as Effective in Older Patients as in Younger Patients? A Comparative Analysis of Weight Loss, Related Comorbidities, and Medication Requirements.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery in the older population has been the subject of ongoing debate but several studies have recently demonstrated its short-term advantages in this age group. It is not yet clear, however, whether these benefits are long-lasting. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with morbid obesity who underwent laparoscopy sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). These patients were divided into two groups: those above 60 years of age (older group) and those of 60 years or under (younger group). Variables evaluated included demographics and anthropometrics data, comorbidities, and daily medication requirements. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-two patients underwent LSG, 57 in the older group and 195 in the younger group. Outcomes related to weight loss in the older subjects were modest compared to those in the younger population (older group %EWL 41.6 vs younger group %EWL 51.1, p < 0.05, older group %TWL 24.9% vs younger group %TWL 25.2%, p < 0.05). During follow-up, both older and younger patients showed an improvement in all the comorbidities: hypertension (older 82.5% vs 38.1%, younger 52.6% vs 29.2%, p < 0.05), type 2 diabetes mellitus (older 38.6% vs 27.3%, 34.9% vs 23.9%, p < 0.05), hyperlipidemia (older 75.4% vs 42.9%, younger 35.9% vs 21.1%, p < 0.05), and OSAHS (older 57.9% vs 30%, younger 40.4% vs 7.1%, p < 0.05). The average number of daily medications used to manage comorbidities decreased in both groups. CONCLUSION: LSG in older patients is effective in terms of weight loss, improvement of comorbidities, and lower daily medication requirements up to 5 years of follow-up.

Are Smoke and Aerosols Generated During Laparoscopic Surgery a Biohazard? A Systematic Evidence-Based Review.

Background. Laparoscopic surgery generates end products that can have potentially harmful effects for the surgical team from short- or long-time exposure. In view of the current SARS-CoV-2 circumstances, controversy has risen concerning the safety of surgical smoke (SS) and aerosols and the perception of an increased risk of exposure during laparoscopic surgery. Methods. The present qualitative systematic review was conducted according to Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies (MOOSE). A literature search was performed from March 2020 up to May 10, 2020, using the PubMed database, Cochrane, and Google Scholar to assess the risk of airborne transmission of viruses and the potential health risk of surgical smoke- and aerosol-generating procedures produced during laparoscopic surgery. The keywords were introduced in combination to obtain better search results. Application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria identified 44 relevant articles. Results. Genetic material from certain viruses, or the virus itself, has been detected in SS and aerosols. However, in the current SARS-CoV-2, as in other coronavirus situations, studies analyzing the presence of airborne transmission of viruses in surgical smoke are lacking. Conclusion. Despite the lack of clear evidence regarding the risk of diseases as the result of smoke- and aerosol-generating procedures during laparoscopic surgery, further investigation is needed. Meanwhile, all available precautions must be taken.

Insights into the treatment of postsleeve gastrectomy leak: analysis of the results of 105 cases on a national register.

BACKGROUND: Many options have been put forward to treat staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) but no clear consensus has emerged concerning a management algorithm. OBJECTIVES: Aiming to establish a pattern to tailor treatment, the Spanish Society of Obesity Surgery (SECO) and the Obesity Section of the Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC) set up a national register to record treatment of leaks after SG. SETTING: Multiple hospital centers, Spain. METHODS: Between September 2016 and December 2017, cases were entered into an online database. Results were assessed according to the number and type of therapeutic procedures. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients from 27 centers were diagnosed with postSG leak. The mean age was 44 years, and 77 (73%) were women. Mean body mass index (BMI) was 47 kg/m2. Mortality was 7%. The first treatment was effective in 50% of cases with no significant differences between nonoperative management and surgery. We found no significant correlations between appearance of leak, type of treatment (nonoperative management or surgery), and treatment effectiveness. An endoscopic stent was the first nonoperative option in 30% of cases and second option in 50% of cases, with effectiveness of 61% and 50%, respectively. In patients requiring a third treatment option (n = 25), surgery was more effective than nonoperative treatment (75% versus 8%) and the incidence of complications secondary to endoscopic stent placement was high (71%). CONCLUSION: The choice of postSG leak treatment depends on the patient's clinical condition and the site of the leak. Healing may be slow (>2 months) and may require several interventions using different approaches such as nonoperative treatment, endoscopic stents, or surgery. The effectiveness of endoscopic options decreases and the effectiveness of complex resective or derivative surgery increases with leak duration and the number of treatments required.

Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery in Patients with the Metabolically Healthy Obese Phenotype.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bariatric surgery in metabolically healthy obese (MHO) patients. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational study, we reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent bariatric surgery at a tertiary care hospital between January 2007 and March 2015. Patients who underwent revisional surgery and patients with type 1 diabetes were excluded from the analysis. MHO patients were defined as those without a previous diagnosis of diabetes or atherogenic dyslipidemia and absence of hypoglycemic treatment or treatment with fibrates. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients were included (mean age 48.97 ± 10.32 years, 68.6% of women). Sleeve gastrectomy was performed in 121 patients (64%) and a gastric bypass in 67 patients (36%). Prior to surgery, 36 patients (19%) were MHO. In the second- and third-year post-surgery, MHO patients presented a higher percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) (35.16% vs. 30.34%; p = 0.02 and 33.97% vs. 27.78%; p = 0.013 respectively). Multiple regression analysis showed that MHO was associated with a higher weight loss irrespective of age, sex, baseline BMI, and type of surgery. We did not detect any differences in acute complications between patients with and without MHO after bariatric surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery in MHO patients in our study was associated with higher weight loss than that in MUHO patients. There were no differences between the two groups in respect to acute complications following surgery.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Treatment of Splenomegaly: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To review the evidence regarding the outcomes of laparoscopic techniques in cases of splenomegaly. BACKGROUND: Endoscopic approaches such as laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic, and robotic surgery are commonly used for splenectomy, but the advantages in cases of splenomegaly are controversial. REVIEW METHODS: We conducted a systematic review using PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched up to February 2020. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included for meta-analysis. In relation to laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) versus open splenectomy (OS), 12 studies revealed a significant reduction in length of hospital stay (LOS) of 3.3 days (p = <0.01) in the LS subgroup. Operative time was higher by 44.4 min (p < 0.01) in the LS group. Blood loss was higher in OS 146.2 cc (p = <0.01). No differences were found regarding morbimortality. The global conversion rate was 19.56%. Five studies compared LS and hand-assisted laparosocpic splenectomy (HALS), but no differences were observed in LOS, blood loss, or complications. HALS had a significantly reduced conversion rate (p < 0.01). In two studies that compared HALS and OS (n = 66), HALS showed a decrease in LOS of 4.5 days (p < 0.01) and increase of 44 min in operative time (p < 0.01), while OS had a significantly higher blood loss of 448 cc (p = 0.01). No differences were found in the complication rate. CONCLUSION: LS is a safe approach for splenomegaly, with clear clinical benefits. HALS has a lower conversion rate. Higher-quality confirmatory trials with standardized splenomegaly grading are needed before definitive recommendations can be provided. Prospero registration number: CRD42019125251.

Papel de las endoprótesis en el tratamiento de las fistulas posgastrectomía vertical laparoscópica. Análisis de un registro nacional / The role of endoprostheses in the treatment of leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Analysis of a Spanish registry

Se ha propuesto la endoprótesis como tratamiento eficaz de la fístula tras gastrectomía vertical, pero existe variabilidad en los resultados publicados. Para evaluar la efectividad de la endoprótesis como tratamiento de la fuga posgastrectomía vertical, La Sociedad Española de Cirugía de la Obesidad (SECO) y la Sección de Obesidad de la Asociación Española de Cirujanos (AEC) propusieron a sus miembros participar en un registro nacional donde incluir a pacientes con fístula posgastrectomía vertical. Analizamos los tratados con endoprótesis. Diecinueve centros han utilizado endoprótesis. Se colocaron 51 endoprótesis en 42 pacientes, 34 M/8 H, edad media: 43,8 años, IMC: 47,6. Efectividad global: 45%, con 35% de complicaciones. El estudio uni- y multivariado no objetivó factores determinantes de la eficacia del tratamiento. Un mayor diámetro del tubo gástrico se relacionó con una mayor incidencia de complicaciones. No hemos encontrado factores implicados en la efectividad de la endoprótesis. Apenas es efectiva una segunda endoprótesis si la primera no lo fue

It has been suggested that endoprostheses are an effective treatment for fistulae after sleeve gastrectomy, but the results published are very variable. To analyze the effectiveness of stents as treatment of leakage after sleeve gastrectomy, the Spanish Society of Obesity Surgery (SECO) and the Obesity Division of the Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC) set up a National Registry to record treatments of leaks after sleeve gastrectomy. We have analyzed patients with leaks after sleeve gastrectomy and treated with endoprostheses: 19 medical centers reported the use of endoprostheses, where 51 endoprostheses were used in 42 patients (34 women/8 men, mean age: 43.8 years, BMI: 47.6). Global effectiveness was 45%, with a complication rate of 35%. Uni- and multivariate analyses detected no factors influencing the efficacy of treatment. A larger diameter bouggie used to calibrate the stomach was related to a higher incidence of complications. No factors were found related with better stent efficacy. The effectiveness of a second stent was very low when the previous one had not been effective

Long-term Oncologic Results After Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery Versus Emergency Surgery for Malignant Left-sided Colonic Obstruction: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (ESCO Trial).

OBJECTIVE: To assess overall (OS), time to progression (TTP), and disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years after treatment, comparing stenting as bridge-to-surgery (SBTS) versus emergency surgery (ES) in neoplastic left colon obstruction, secondary endpoints of the previously published randomized controlled trial. BACKGROUND: While SBTS in neoplastic colon obstruction may reduce morbidity and need for a stoma compared with ES, concern has been raised, about long-term survival. METHODS: Individuals affected by left-sided malignant large-bowel obstruction were enrolled from 5 European hospitals and randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive SBTS or ES. The computer-generated randomization sequence was stratified by center on cT and concealed by the use of a web-based application. Investigators and participants were unmasked to treatment assignment. The secondary outcomes analyzed here were OS, TTP, and DFS. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, ID-code NCT00591695. RESULTS: Between March 2008 and November 2015, 144 patients were randomly assigned to undergo either SBTS or ES; 115 (SBTS n = 56, ES n = 59) were eligible for analysis, while 20 participants were excluded for a benign disease, 1 for unavailability of the endoscopist while 8 withdrew from the trial. With a median follow-up of 37 months (range 1-62), no difference was observed in the SBTS group compared with ES in terms of OS (HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.49-1.76), P = 0.822), TTP (HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.42-1.54), P = 0.512), and DFS (HR 1.01 (95% CI 0.56-1.81), P = 0.972). Planned subgroup analysis showed no difference in respect to age, sex, American Society for Anesthesiology score, body mass index, and pT between SBTS and ES groups. Those participants randomized for the SBTS group whose obstruction was located in the descending colon had a better TTP compared with ES group (HR 0.44 (95% CI 0.20-0.97), P = 0.042), but no difference was observed in terms of OS (HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.33-1.63), P = 0.442) and DFS (HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.34-1.34), P = 0.261) in the same individuals. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled trial shows that, although not powered for these seconday outcomes, OS, TTP, and DFS did not differ between groups at a minimum follow-up of 36 months.

The role of endoprostheses in the treatment of leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Analysis of a Spanish registry. / Papel de las endoprótesis en el tratamiento de las fistulas posgastrectomía vertical laparoscópica. Análisis de un registro nacional.

It has been suggested that endoprostheses are an effective treatment for fistulae after sleeve gastrectomy, but the results published are very variable. To analyze the effectiveness of stents as treatment of leakage after sleeve gastrectomy, the Spanish Society of Obesity Surgery (SECO) and the Obesity Division of the Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC) set up a National Registry to record treatments of leaks after sleeve gastrectomy. We have analyzed patients with leaks after sleeve gastrectomy and treated with endoprostheses: 19 medical centers reported the use of endoprostheses, where 51 endoprostheses were used in 42 patients (34 women/8 men, mean age: 43.8 years, BMI: 47.6). Global effectiveness was 45%, with a complication rate of 35%. Uni- and multivariate analyses detected no factors influencing the efficacy of treatment. A larger diameter bouggie used to calibrate the stomach was related to a higher incidence of complications. No factors were found related with better stent efficacy. The effectiveness of a second stent was very low when the previous one had not been effective.

La prehabilitación, un paso más en la optimización del paciente quirúrgico / Prehabilitation: Another step towards the optimization of surgical patients

No disponible

Effects of Bariatric Surgery on HDL Cholesterol.

BACKGROUND: Low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc) are independent predictive factors of coronary heart disease. Bariatric surgery increases HDLc concentration, but the chronology and predictors of this improvement in HDLc levels are not well-established. The aim of the present study was to analyse the changes over time in HDLc concentrations after bariatric surgery and to determine the predictors of their increase. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study. The medical records of patients who had undergone bariatric surgery at a tertiary care hospital between January 2007 and March 2015 were reviewed. Patients who underwent revisional surgery or were treated with fibrates were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients were included in the study. Follow-up rates were as follows: 87% (year 2) and 28% (year 5). At postoperative month 3, HDLc levels decreased significantly versus baseline (- 11.1%; p = 0.000), at which point they began to rise, reaching their maximum level 2 years after bariatric surgery (26.2% increase from baseline; p = 0.000). The increase in HDLc concentration 2 years after surgery correlated with the preoperative HDLc level (r = - 0.292, p = 0.001), and it was greater in patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass (0.36 ± 0.4 vs. 0.18 ± 0.4 mmol/L, respectively; p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery has a beneficial effect on HDLc levels. The maximum increase in postoperative HDLc concentrations is observed 2 years after surgery. Preoperative HDLc and the type of surgery are both significant predictors of the maximum increase in HDLc levels.

Paraesophageal Hernia: To Mesh or Not to Mesh? The Controversy Continues.

Introduction: Paraesophageal hernias represent 5%-10% of all primary hiatal hernias and are becoming increasingly more common with the aging of the population. Surgical treatment includes closure of the wide hiatal gap. Achieving tension-free closure is difficult, and several studies have reported lower recurrence rates with the use of mesh reinforcement. The use of this technique, however, is controversial. Objective and Materials and Methods: Narrative revision of the literature revising: (1) evidence-based surgery and clinical studies, (2) what the experts say (Delphi), (3) complications of mesh, and (4) long-term results of laparoscopic treatment impact on the quality of life. Results: Consensus about the type of mesh continues to be elusive, and we clearly need a higher level of evidence to address the controversy. Conclusion: Mesh reinforcement can effectively reduce the hernia recurrence rate. Mesh-associated complications are few, but because they are serious, most experts recommend mesh use only in specific circumstances, particularly those in relation to the size of the hiatal defect and the quality of the crura.